Skip to content
How I work

Internal Family Systems


I draw on Internal Family Systems, or IFS, as one way to make sense of inner conflict. Parts language can help describe why one part of you wants change while another works hard to keep things as they are. It is a lens I draw on within psychotherapy, alongside other ways of working.

More than one response can be true.

You might want to open up in a relationship and, at the same time, feel a strong impulse to withdraw. You may intend to rest and find yourself working longer. Rather than treating one response as the real you and the other as an obstacle, parts language lets us ask what each response is trying to accomplish. The contradiction can carry information.

In this language, a part is a way of naming a recognizable inner position, not a separate person inside you. It may have familiar thoughts, feelings and bodily responses. You do not have to adopt the vocabulary for it to be useful. If it feels artificial, we can speak in ordinary terms about competing needs, habits or fears instead.

I draw on IFS alongside other approaches in individual psychotherapy. The question is not whether every experience fits one model. It is whether this way of paying attention makes it easier to understand what is happening without turning against yourself.

Ask what the response has been guarding.

A protective response may appear as control, distance, constant planning or an insistence that you should not need help. It can be tempting to get rid of it as quickly as possible. But it may have developed when there were good reasons not to risk trust or uncertainty. Understanding those reasons does not require keeping the pattern unchanged forever.

On how I work, one principle is that patterns are adaptive. That principle helps me approach a protective part with curiosity rather than treating it as a problem to defeat. What conditions taught it to work so hard? What does it anticipate if it steps back? What resources are available now that were not available then?

This does not mean every response is equally helpful in the present. A strategy can protect something important and still create distance from people you care about. We can hold both facts at once. The work is not to declare a winner among your reactions but to understand how they came to organize the whole.

Pacing is part of the method.

If a protective response has been keeping difficult material out of view, pushing past it may make the work harder. Capacity before intensity is another principle of my practice. We can begin by noticing what happens around the edge of a subject and what helps you stay present, before asking whether to go further.

‘Talking about it will make things worse’ is a concern worth taking seriously. An invitation to speak is not an obligation to reveal the most painful part of a history. We can work with what is happening today, the hesitation itself, and the way it shows up in relationships or in the body. You retain a say in what we explore and when.

The somatic therapy page describes attention to breath, bracing, startle and shutdown as part of talk therapy. That attention can sit alongside parts language: a protective response may be visible in the body before it has a sentence. Neither lens requires us to turn an ordinary session into an exercise you did not choose.

How IFS sits alongside FSRT.

Functional Systems Regulation Theory, or FSRT, is the framework I am developing for understanding how living systems organize around stability, relationship and changing conditions. FSRT gives a wider frame for why a response that once made sense can persist after the situation changes. Parts language offers another way to describe the inner positions involved in that persistence.

These are not interchangeable theories, and I do not ask you to learn either one to take part in therapy. If a concept helps us see a pattern more clearly, we can use it. If it draws attention away from the particular life you are living, we can set it aside. The relationship and the person in front of me come before fidelity to a vocabulary. You can ask why I am using a particular word, or say that it does not fit; those questions are part of the work, not interruptions to it.

Sessions are available at the Vero Beach office and by secure video when you are physically in Florida. A free phone consultation lasts up to 15 minutes. If you want to ask about the approach, practical format or cost before beginning, the rates page and consultation are places to start. I cannot promise a certain outcome; I can explain how I work and listen to what you are looking for.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is IFS the only approach you use?
No. I draw on Internal Family Systems alongside somatic work, psychodynamic therapy, CBT, mindfulness-based work and FSRT.
Do I need to use parts language?
No. It is a possible way to describe inner conflict. We can use ordinary language if that fits better.
Can this work happen over video?
Yes, by secure video if you are physically in Florida during the session, or in person in Vero Beach.

Therapy outcomes vary from person to person. No result is promised or guaranteed.